
¿Estás teniendo dificultades para obtener su solicitud de VISA debido a los requisitos de vacunación? ¿O tienes fuertes sentimientos en…
NOTE: This article has been updated.
As promised, Andres Mejer Law is closely monitoring the Trump travel ban and its rollout. Below, we discuss some of the most recent updates.
On June 29, 2017, the federal government started implementing the partial Trump travel ban. According to the Supreme Court’s decision, President Trump cannot ban visa applicants from six Muslim-majority countries and refugees if they have a bona fide relationship with the United States. In the decision, the Court gives three examples of bona fide relationships:
Before the travel ban became effective, the government reviewed the Supreme Court’s decision and interpreted these criteria.
The Supreme Court states that there is a bona fide relationship if you have close family within the U.S. The Trump Administration is interpreting “a close familial relationship” as:
Grandparents, aunts, uncles, nephews, nieces, cousins, and other relatives are not considered “close family.”
Refugees who are already in transit will be allowed to enter through July 6, 2017. After that, Mr. Trump’s executive order halts the processing of refugees for at least 120 days. However, there are exceptions to this rule. Refugees can still be admitted on a case-by-case basis. Additionally, your refugee application will be processed if you have a bona fide relationship with the United States. A relationship with a refugee resettlement agency is not considered a bona fide relationship.
Business travelers and tourists from the six Muslim-majority countries will not receive new non-immigrant visas unless they have a bona fide relationship with the United States. It appears that business people have bona fide relationships if they:
If you have a valid visa, it will likely be honored.
When immigrants do not have a job or family within the United States, they typically apply for immigrant visas through the diversity visa lottery system. It is unclear whether diversity visa holders have a bona fide relationship with the United States.
On June 29, 2017, Hawaii asked the federal courts to review the Trump Administration’s newest travel ban policies. In its motion, Hawaii asks the court to:
We will continue to closely monitor this case.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE BELOW.
On June 26, 2017, the United States Supreme Court permitted partial implementation of the Trump travel ban. While the president has celebrated the Court’s decision as a political “win,” this may be an overstatement. In reality, the Supreme Court’s decision impacts a relatively small group of visa applicants. However, immigration advocacy groups are watching closely for abuse.
There have been two versions of President Trump’s “Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States” — or, the Trump travel ban. Initially, seven Muslim-majority countries were targeted (including Iraq) and Christian refugees were given preferential treatment. The Trump administration argued that the ban was necessary while it evaluated immigration vetting procedures. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals quickly stopped this first version of the travel ban, finding the president overstepped his authority.
In response to the court’s decision, Mr. Trump revised his original executive order in March 2017. The intent of the changes were to protect the travel ban from additional judicial scrutiny. The March 2017 travel ban imposed the following restrictions:
The government clarified that the travel ban addressed future visa applications — and did not impact current visa holders.
Again, the courts stopped the implementation of the travel ban — voicing concerns about religious discrimination and presidential authority. The Trump Administration appealed these decisions, arguing that the President has broad authority over issues of immigration and national security.
The Supreme Court, in an unsigned order, allowed certain parts of the travel ban to take effect. However, the Court imposed a new limitation on the Trump travel ban. The United States cannot bar immigrants with a “bona fide” connection to our country. This includes immigrants that have:
Additionally, the justices encouraged the government to quickly and effectively finish their review of the visa and refugee vetting processes. In a partial dissent, the Supreme Court’s more conservative justices (Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch) argue that the Trump travel ban should be fully implemented.
Within the legal and non-profit communities, there are differing opinions about how the partial Trump travel ban will impact immigrants. Some, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), do not think the partial ban will impact many visa applicants. Others, including Amnesty International, have a bleaker view.
Mr. Trump’s travel ban will be effective 72 hours after the Supreme Court’s decision. It is important to note that the partial travel ban only affects new visa applicants — and not current visa holders. And, if you have a legitimate job offer, university acceptance letter, or family within the United States, the Trump travel ban should not impact you.
Initially, the Trump travel ban caused chaos at American airports and resulted in a flood of litigation. The federal government rescinded tens of thousands of visas. Others were stranded in airports and unnecessarily detained. The federal government is currently reviewing the Supreme Court decision and determining how to implement the partial ban. We are monitoring this implementation closely and are prepared to fight any abuse that occurs.
Finally, this Supreme Court decision is not the Court’s final assessment of the ban. The Court will revisit the travel ban in the fall of 2017 — looking at the constitutionality of Mr. Trump’s executive order and the limits of presidential authority. Whether the ban is upheld may depend on the makeup of the Court in the fall. Justice Kennedy — who is seen as a “swing vote” in the politically split Court — may be contemplating retirement.
If you have concerns about how the Trump travel ban impacts your or a loved one’s visa application, contact an immigration lawyer immediately. American immigration policies are changing quickly and dedicated immigration lawyers are on the front lines fighting for your rights. At Andres Mejer Law, we understand the fear and uncertainty you are facing and are here to help. Contact us for a free and confidential evaluation
Share This Post!1065 US-22 Suite 2B
Bridgewater Township, NJ 08807
Copyright 2022 Provencher and Flatt, LLP - All Rights Reserved. Powered by Advantage Attorney Marketing & Cloud Solutions